Hello all. I'm interviewing soon for a management position in my company. I purchased the interviewing series a few weeks ago, and I'm just soaking up the wealth of knowledge provided. Thanks to Mark and Mike for sharing their help.
I wondered if there was a strategic advantage to being the first or last interviewee for a position. I know the Primary and Recency theory of psychology says that we remember the first and the last in a series of events/object/etc. better than those in the middle. From an interviewing standpoint, I would assume the same to be true. Is one better than the other, though, if one were given a choice as to what time slot they wanted?