Forums

During my career, at one time I was promoted from 'Junior xyz' to 'Senior xyz'. 

That had been a reflection of my progression in the subject matter, whereas my role and responsibilities had remained largely identical. How would I best go about putting that into an MT style CV. 

I do NOT want to mark the entire extent of the xyz position as "Senior", because I was not, AND because the move to 'Senior' i.m.o. shows 'progression'. 

On the other hand, simply adding a new line with a new time-range and a new title, but no additional info to add seems awkward. Since this part is so far in my past, I cannot realy tie a suffiient amount of responsibilties or achievements to either one or the other positions. 

What I have right now is this: 

Jan 2000 - Jan 2001: Senior xyz, ACME - Achieved promotion to "senior" grade in identical role. 
Jan 1999 - Dec 1999: Junior xyz, ACME - Responsible for ... . 
 
 
Another question is: when starting a new role on the first of the month, the timeline looks like the above. Is this sufficiently un-ambiguous, or does it leave a hiring manager thinking that I want to dust over 8 weeks of undocumented time? 
 
THANKS! 

Kevin1's picture

Hi Karl,

One option - make it an accomplishment.

Title the role without the 'Junior' moniker. like so
Jan 1999 - Dec 1999: xyz, ACME - Responsible for ...

and first bullet might be
Earned promotion to Senior Grade after meeting all targets

Kind regards
Kevin

gehrhorn's picture
Licensee Badge

The timeline is not confusing to me (nor to anyone who reads resumes I would think).

There's a cast for multiple jobs in one company. It may offer some insight on your situation.