How much of my direct report's annual performance evaluation should be based on their direct's (my skip's) performance?
For example: Collaboration is a primary criteria I am using. My direct is somewhere between OK and mediocre. This person's directs include the following (approximate) distribution:
- excellent (1 skip)
- average (2 direct)
- sub-par (3 directs)
- combative (2 directs)
I am trying to weigh the direct's individual performance vs the direct's responsibility to insure performance by their staff (which is, of course included in their individual performance to some degree).